Insight into anti-Refuge opinions
I have been using ChatGPT (in my experience, superb for factual info) for about as long as it has been around. Its main effects on Rocky Flats issues has been to make readily available definitive answers to concrete questions. It may blunt the contempt for authority, including CDPHE an the DOE, exhibited by many anti-Refuge groups.
I have wondered about what makes Downwinders (and other non-neighbors of the Refuge) so vulnerable to misinformation and to radiophobia. ChatGPT has turned wondering into concrete plausible analysis (albeit not yet peer-reviewed publications).
I urge you to visit my exchange with ChatGPT at https://chatgpt.com/…/6975632d-d678-800f-86ff-231b6999f5d4 .
FYI: principal component analysis mathematically identifies important categories (in this case, variables appropriate to the population around Rocky Flats) which account for most of the variability in responses.
The analysis is HYPOTHETICAL (that is, not based on actual survey data), but is based on awareness of the Rocky Flats area population and history, and analysis of public response elsewhere, such as around Fukushima. So: the main impact of anti-Refuge, anti-nuclear activity is to REDUCE trust in institutions, not the actual perceived risks due to plutonium.